Are Gorgeous Women More Difficult than Cute or Pretty Ones?

Some guys will tell you to get a beautiful girl, treat her the same as any girl. Good advice, but it’s worth keeping in mind: she isn’t, actually, the same as any girl.

Uh, yeah. Duh.

But every so often, I’ll hear some guy say something like “You should just treat that girl like she’s a 7.”

To an extent, I agree, but that doesn’t mean that if you walk up to any stunner on the street and treat her like you would any other girl, you’re automatically going to sleep with her.

Your initial cockiness might intrigue her and get you to the hook point, but very quickly she’s going to find out if you’re really as good as you pretend to be. And if you’re not her superior, she will quickly expose you.

You See, Hotter Women Have Higher Standards

Want to prove me wrong?

Okay, go out and get bombshells as consistently as you do average women. There are a practically infinite amount of them out there, so quantity is NOT your issue. All you need to do is move to a major city and you will see gorgeous women on every block.

I guarantee you will lay these women with far less consistency than your average cute or pretty girl, EVEN if you account for quantity ratios.

Why?

Because gorgeous women are more difficult.

They have less tolerance for mistakes, because they can afford to. Here’s where guys miss the mark when judging the standards and promiscuity of gorgeous women or hot women. They assume that since these women have so many options, they must be sluts.

This is incorrect. You are viewing female sexuality from a male perspective.

Yes, there are women with high sex drives or masculine personas. Maybe they were born with that programming, or some past trauma or bad parenting drove them to promiscuity.

However, the higher quality the woman, the higher quality men she’ll choose to be promiscuous with, if she’s promiscuous at all.

And the promiscuous ones are usually the “hot” women, or those who grew up in very liberal households. Women with nice asses, great tits, and tight bodies gained from working out. Less often are genuinely beautiful women promiscuous.

They’ve spent their entire lives being beautiful. Even before the arrival of puberty that allowed kinda cute girls with huge tits to compete with them, these beautiful girls were always treated differently. They were treated special.

Enough years of special treatment, and it becomes normal. And if it’s normal, one doesn’t accumulate much arrogance from people treating them special. It’s expected. Thus, such a person is usually much nicer and humbler.

Also, you’re far less likely to be treated like shit if you’re a beautiful woman, because everyone around you will watch their step. Men won’t want to mess up their chances with you, and female friends won’t want to lose your friendship, because your beauty helps put them in the vicinity of hot guys. Most of the time, if you’re a beautiful woman and someone does treat you badly, you assume they’re too stupid to realize how great you are (in most cases...).

However, in contrast to beautiful girls, hot girls don’t become hot until puberty. They grow up next to these naturally beautiful women, constantly feeling inferior and watching all the men vie for the naturally beautiful one.

Some will eventually settle with her, because that’s all they can get, but she still knows her value. She’s not stupid. The primary value of a woman is her looks. For guys who bemoan being born less than some chiseled Chad Thundercock, just imagine how ugly chicks feel. It’s 90% of their arsenal. If any “looks are everything” argument can be made, it’s for women.

Now, women still have no problem getting cock. This confuses the men who could never imagine that women have it hard, but again, they’re judging female sexuality by male standards (thereby demonstrating their lack of empathy and sympathy; so much for their pity party).

Cock isn’t the issue. Even okay looking girls can get a pretty hot guy if they make it easy for him, but they have a DAMN hard time locking these guys down.

Her challenge is not getting someone into her bed. It is keeping him there.

And that’s how a woman’s value is measured, by her ability to lock a guy down. There is no value in a woman sleeping with a bunch of guys. It’s retardedly easy.

When the soon-to-be-hot girl finally hits puberty, she does gain a massive amount of new options that she didn’t previously have, for both cock and commitment. She can further min/max her real-life video game character by getting in better shape, learning how to wear makeup, and dressing well, while also training her charm and social value, but these women still tend to be more promiscuous than naturally beautiful women, thus they’re easier to bed.

Why? They have to. To lock down the higher-quality gents, they need to give the guy some pussy and get him addicted. Hopefully this draws the guy away from more naturally beautiful or charming women who keep putting off sex. He gets intoxicated with the tight, wet pussy and forgets about the beautiful girl who strung him along... well, kinda. He’ll still want that girl more, but his effort and time will be drained by his less attractive but sluttier gal’s mouth and snatch.

Only the most beautiful of women can get super-high-value guys to commit before sex – or almost guarantee he will stick around after sex if he does manage to sleep with her quickly.

And most men are going to have invest a good amount of time and/or effort into getting that girl.

The Hotter the Girl, the Harder the Tests

Tests are designed to see if a man is who he says he is. They also inspire men to work harder to prove they are who they say they are.

He tells her what he does for a living. She asks him about it and gets enough details to know he’s not lying. She listens closely to his voice and watches his face.

She tells him what she does for a living. She waits to see if he cares. How deeply does he probe? How does he ask his questions? Does he seem genuine?

If at any point he says or does something that could be insincere or polarizing enough that it surprises her, she will question it, challenge it, or simply say nothing to see how he responds. If he responds correctly, it will make her feel comfortable. He is who he seems to be.

If, for instance, she starts to doubt that he likes her and only wants sex, she’ll make him put in more time, or at least show more emotion (which is the resource she really seeks when she requires a guy to pour time into her) before she again is happy with who he appears to be.

If he’s good, he’ll come off better than he first seemed to be by the way he passes the test.

With these tests, she’s generally circling around one question: What role do I want him to play in my life?

It’s okay if she sees you as a boyfriend candidate. But it is paramount that she ALSO sees you as a lover. It’s also good if she only sees you as a lover (unless you’d like to date her... then you need to work on displaying boyfriend qualities).

Here’s the bad news if you want to sleep with really high-quality women.

Such a woman only takes one type of man as a lover.

Her superior.

Or more accurately, a man she perceives as her superior.

Women Only Hook Up with Superiors

If women casually slept with their inferiors or equals, every chick would have lay counts in the triple or quadruple digits. We know that is not the case. Despite the “cock carousel” myth of the Red Pill and Manosphere communities, it’s rare for a girl to have above fifty lays – even well into her thirties – let alone a hundred or more. I personally know only a handful of women still in their 20s who are in the triple digits, and I’ve met a lot of women.

Your average “sluts,” by the time they’re in their mid twenties, have only slept with maybe twenty to thirty guys, even the “cute” ones. And that’s on the high end, if my samplings are representative of the population at large (they are).

Less-attractive women are sluttier, as outlined in my article on the 3 Types of Sluts. They do it as a competitive tactic, and they aren’t as confident as attractive women. And physical intimacy for them is validation, especially when getting it from a hot guy.

Less-attractive women can turn into hot girls to improve their competitiveness and often outcompete beautiful women, but rarely are they as picky as beautiful women, even after the transformation of their body and fashion (I’m leaving plastic surgery out of the equation).

Since women are heavily influenced by their pasts (more so than men), if they haven’t been beautiful all their life, they’re usually a bit less picky. Their childhood insecurities will usually linger with them for a long time. This is why her past matters. Mind you, no one is perfect (and a girl who had a close to perfect upbringing might be... boring? A little crazy is nice).

But even hot women sleep with fewer men than cute girls do, because the number of men who are their superiors diminishes as they get hotter.

A cute girl who is a 7, let’s say, has TONS of guys who are her superior.

However, an 8? Well, a significant number of men are knocked out of the running, since the average man tends to be less than average (read that sentence a few times).

She wants to go to bed with men... but only men she views as better than her.

A girl who was a 7 but decides to do a bunch of squats, get a tight stomach, and dress nicely might bump up to an 8 or 8.5. At that point, she is going to see the new quality of men she can get and leave her old scraps behind.

A guy who’s an 8 might go on a date with a 7 or an 8, but his game needs to be insane to bang her on the first date. Or he needs to be so compatible with her that she thinks it’s a match made in heaven (and her realizing this compatibility is often the result of his game, i.e., his ability to show and elicit values).

Okay, but the important question: why do women only casually hook up with their superiors?

Because the prospect of shagging him outweighs the risk of losing him.

Losing him can mean never seeing him again, because having so many other women like her in his rotation, he’s not going to wait around long for her to give up the pussy if she tries to withhold sex. She needs to get the cock while she can, or he’s gone.

Losing him can also mean getting pumped and dumped. He humps her once or a handful of times, then when she gets clingy, annoying, or pushes for something more serious (like being taken out in public or not getting kicked out immediately after he busts a nut), he’ll ghost on her.

However, when a man is sufficiently superior to a woman, she will accept this risk. Getting his cock, being in his masculine presence, and having the hope of locking him down (no matter how faint) is much better than most (if not all) of her other prospects.

On a value-to-value level, this is why women sleep with a man quickly.

Otherwise, she would require more commitment from him, because it’s a boon to her in all aspects to withhold sex for as long as she can; she gets to test him more and see if he’s the stud he portrays himself to be, and she gets more investment from him, which significantly increases his likelihood of sticking around after sex. It also gives her one fewer notch while she courts OTHER men.

And yes, women with lower lay counts are more valuable, by definition. Supply and demand, my friends. It works for every resource on earth, including pussy.

Not only does it increase a woman’s value to have as few partners as she can, it increases her perception of her own value (her self-esteem).

When a girl has sex with a guy, he becomes much closer to her, because, even if she’s a huge slut, he’s still in the one percent of the one percent of men she’s met who have also slept with her. Think of how many men women meet on a regular basis and how many of them they shag. Even massive sluts have a very tiny ratio. Same as with men; most men sleep with a tiny fraction of the women they meet, even if they’re super studs.

So if she avoids allowing him into this super-secret club, she also has lower chances of falling in love with him, because women cannot control who they fall in love with so long as they’re sleeping him. They also have lower chances of getting impregnated (super important if he’s not one of her best options), and lower chances of getting an STD (usually far more devastating to women than men).

Thus you can see why women will only casually (and quickly) sleep with their superiors.

They want their club of lovers to be the most elite they can have. They want the chances of getting impregnated by a lower-level male to be as low as possible (even if he’s cute and the sex would be fun). And she wants to avoid getting some STD from a “meh” guy who porks other “meh” girls (who are, as we mentioned, sluttier). See the genius logic? And that’s all intuitive for her. Super-sentient machines of sexual selection.

The only exception I see is the case where a girl becomes a Huntress. There is always a trigger for women to become a Huntress, but once she becomes one, she will sleep with a large variety of men. Her tastes, however, will usually match her own quality, albeit with a larger margin of error.

If a few guys who are her equal or inferior do get to pound her muffin, it will not happen on their terms. She will control the entire seduction. I call her a Huntress for a reason.

This is fine so long as you don’t date her (major key alert: do not date a Huntress. I’ve done it. You. Will. Get. Played.)

The More Attractive She is, the Harder She Is

At its core, this article is superfluous. No one should have to explain that the more beautiful she is, the harder she is. But some men, including those who wish to sell you their sweet seduction snake oil, will try to convince you otherwise.

They will take tangential but disconnected facts like:

• Beautiful women are approached less often than cute or hot girls

• Beautiful women are still women

• Beautiful women are insecure, just like any girl

• Girls want dick, no matter who they are

Then they’ll translate this into some “stunning women are just as easy as any other girl” argument, which is simply not true.

There’s the NFL, and there’s college football. Similar rules. Same game. But way different leagues.

Also, it’s important to understand why they’re harder to get.

Pretty girl versus stunner.

Yes, the stunner operates by the same fundamental systems of mate evaluation as the pretty girl. They want strong, dominant men who make them feel desired and understood.

But the stunner feels more entitled to have that latter quality of being understood; she has plenty of sexy men available to her because of her looks and personality, but now she needs to know that you also get her. Sexy is uncommon, but sexy and sincere is ultra rare.

You can still get the beautiful girl. But you must be superior to your fellow man to get her.

And seeing as she’s rare, she wants a mate who’s at least at her level. But for someone to be a lover, to lay her quickly, and for her to be unsure whether he’ll commit, well, he better be REALLY worth the risk. He must be legendary (queue Pokémon song).

Tighter fundamentals. Tighter game. And she will only allow him a few mistakes, if any.

Because why shouldn’t she?

If you had to choose between that cute girl over there and this stunner, and you know you can have both, you’re going to choose the stunner every time.

Same with her. In a sea of inferiors and equals, she’s usually only going to quickly sleep with her superiors.

And since sleeping with women quickly is our motto, I suggest you get to work on becoming the superior of the women you want.

Because at that point, they become regular to you.

And that’s where the fun begins. The game becomes easy.

Hector