The Problem with Direct Game, Pt 1: Does Direct Game Work? | Girls Chase

The Problem with Direct Game, Pt 1: Does Direct Game Work?

Chase Amante

Hey! Chase Amante here.

You've read all the free articles I can offer you for this month.

If you'd like to read more, I've got to ask for your help keeping the lights on at Girls Chase.

Click a plan below to sign up now and get right back to reading. It's only 99¢ the first month.

Already a subscriber? Log in here.

Alek Rolstad's picture

By: Alek Rolstad

direct gameDirect game (where you never conceal your interest in a girl) gets a good wrap in men's circles. Yet it never works nearly as well as its proponents advertise…

Hey guys. Welcome back.

Last week, I attempted to debunk the perceived inequality between the sexes and their power on the dating market. It is easy for men to perceive women as more powerful because they get more attention, and therefore are more in control.

After all, men chase women for sex; they can say “yes” or “no” to their requests. Demand is high when it comes to sex with beautiful women.

Although both men and women seek validation, male and female sex drives differ in the source of validation.

Men get validation through sex, and women receive it through attention—more precisely, sexual attention—knowing that men find them desirable.

Both can enjoy sex and desire sex equally on a PHYSICAL and even EMOTIONAL level.

However, men are not only led by their drive toward sexual satisfaction but by their ego—their feeling of power and attractiveness from “conquering” a woman through sex.

Hence, men have two motivations to seek sexual encounters:

  • Their sex drive, which they share with women

  • Their ego drive

Females get satisfaction by having someone desiring them, which does not involve a need to put out.

We know that “putting out” and having sex left and right with men can lead to social consequences for women. Women fear the slut label, so they have fewer incentives to put out.


Petr's picture

OK nice. Then please give DAYGAME reliable and canned opener and transition in cold approach...that fullfills all this indirect needs. Thats the thing- you are cold approaching- you are giving her attention cause you want to fuck her period- cold approach has ALWAYS direct subtext..ALWAYS. Thats why normal guys dont cold approach. And please dont give example of a TOURIST preferable from WEST in FSU country asking for starbucks- HAS ZERO VALIDITY FOR NORMAL GUY LIVING IN HIS HOME TOWN OR CITY. Why write these negative "debunking" articles with no alternatives guys???

Zanardi's picture

... asking her where a pet shop is. Talk a bit about pets and carry on from there.

Petr's picture

Ok. Second you keep talking she knows its a pickup. After she gives answers and you transition- this is a pickup- Cold approach is always direct.... All attractive girls know you want to fuck them if you talk to them on the street, after you keep talking ....Tell me Im wrong- go ahead Tell me Im wrong.

Rambalt's picture


I agree with your article and in hindsight I can now see how in the past I lost some lays due to being very direct.

But how do you explain results of folks like Hector Castillo who bluntantly tell girls that they want to fuck em, finger em etc

Isn't that the sort of blatant direct you are coming against here.

I think that's also the same style Sasha daygame uses and he gets okay results with it.


Kampftrinker's picture

How do you know Sasha gets good results? Based on the infield footage I've seen I would say his game isn't really good. Actually it's kind of hard to watch. I don't think he's the best example of direct game nor "natural game" out there.

Bizzy's picture

"I am talking about hardcore direct game: those who invite a girl on a date soon after meeting her, display sexual interest right away or keep complimenting her, telling her how you two should party together."

This is not direct game and it isn't hardcore either. It's actually indirect game mixed with a little indirect interest. Direct game means NO dates, no partying together, no useless compliments. It means flirting with a woman on the spot for a short period of time and telling her that you want to take her home, or fuck her right there or whatever that illustrates lust. And it doesn't really give her validation either because you are not telling her how pretty she is, you are just telling her that she turns you on and that you want to fuck her which is not the same. Whenever I told women that I find them sexy they questioned my intentions because they knew I wanted to have sex and yet I still scored because I made it clear that I wanted sex. Imagine an average woman approached you and told you "I want you to fuck me hard", there is a good chance you will get horny even when she is not your type and the same thing can be true for women if you are at least attractive to her. No compliance needed.

"If you have something she wants, she will chase you, and have sex with you for it, whether it is high social value, or if she perceives you are an accomplished lover capable of providing plenty of orgasms.."

What is the point her wanting to sleep with me just because of my social value? I want her to lust for me, not view me as valuable so she can show me off to her friends because of my status or money. If she sees me as an accomplished lover then she will want to sleep with me as soon as possible anyway.

Petr's picture

Are you black? Or are you picking up black chicks (serious question, not trolling)?

Leave a Comment

One Date girl next to the number one

Get The Girl In Just One Date

It only takes one date to get the girl you want. Best of all, the date's easy to get… and girls love it.

Inside One Date, You'll Learn

  • How to build instant chemistry
  • Ways to easily create arousal
  • How to get girls to do what you want
  • The secret to a devoted girlfriend

…and more great Girls Chase Tech