The Beauty, Greatness, and Goodness of Female Moral Nature

Hey,

the most relationships, where I only had sex with the woman, were time limited. Moreover, after the end of the open relationship they also never came back to me.

Do I have to progress the relationship into a real one to get more sex?
How can they see my strenght again, so that they come back to me?

Best regards,
Sebastian

What I got from this is to never trust a bitch, even though I have always felt this way. Whew, this was a read and I got some questions.

1. When you say girls want strong mates to have kids with all I picture are guys with good careers money ,etc. Then i realized, there are a lot of men who are successful that have kids that do not become successful in a sense. There are many celebrities with kids who don't live up to there parent a lot of the time, some of them are emotional wrecks. The kids are successful that they have their fathers perks, but it sounds more like if a girl gets with a celeb, it's more for her to be taken care of.

Then I thought of regular dudes with decent careers, some guys are weak as hell and they have the career, but they get walked on by their women, why would she want to have kids with him then? How would the offspring be strong, if the father is weak? Is it just for his money?

Then my final scenario is the baby father, why do these girls have kids with men that most likely will not be in a child's life, and they have no career prospects? Is it because he's strong with confidence and dominance?

My whole point is, what makes a strong man? Is it mostly how he acts? Is it his career and money? Or does she just love him?

A man could have a good career, but could be weak in his personality, so his kids might be the same.

A man could not have any career prospects, but have the confidence and drive, and a woman will have babies with him.

Because there's so many scenarios where women are having kids with men that don't guarantee there kids will be successful.

2. When you were dealing with your no career prospects phase, how did you keep your confidence to seduce and have relationships with women with great careers? I would feel a little unconfident because of the career thing. How did you overcome that while dating these women, and making them look at you like a high value strong man dispite the career problems ?
How can we do this if we run into career problems and want to keep picking up?

3. What does it mean if a girl still wants to be with you even after you told her from the beginning that you don't want to have kids with her, meet her family, or marry her? And you been with her past the 2 year drop? She treats you exactly the same way with strong love as it's always been?

Is it the power of you being honest with her form jump that makes her stay ? Is it the fact you can leave when you want?

4. So I'm guessing that girls Will understand and be forgiving if a man cheats and sleeps around New women. We just want to sleep with women and have fun.

I feel after reading this, why can't we do it and keep the girl loyal to us? She can have her little secret plans to abandon ship when she feels you're weak or whatever and you have to sit around and be loyal to her?

It sounds like a man has to sleep around.

5. How do we become this strong man that women love ? Is it just mostly from this site? Or do we need money and career prospects too? Can you be a strong man a woman wants to have kids with you no matter What? Or at least stay with you?

An example genes, can a girl not care about anything else, but genes?

6. Doesn't us looking like the husband type that will provide work against us? Or we wait to show her later we can take care of her and the kids? I would feel I would always act the same and never look like a provider at all.

Beautiful Piece

Chase,

Who the f@ck are you man..?! Phenomenal piece.

Hope to have a beer and a conversation with you someday.

Keep on man, you inspire us all.

John.

Chase,

thanks for answering my earlier detailed question.

Was wondering if you'd get around to finishing the article I suggested you write about how to correctly use emotions in a manly, authentic way?

I believe you got half way through or something.

Thanks

While I understand the imperatives behind such behaviors in women, of such a moral code, I wouldn't go so far as to consider it elegant and beautiful. I mean I can't see any beauty in a woman asserting that her kid dindu nuffin and is a good boy if though there's sound and image of him committing an armed robbery (not referring to anyone in particular). I also can't see any good in a woman cheating even for any of the three reasons you mentioned, there's just no justifying it in my view, including biology; a woman leaving when a man behaves a certain way, that's justifiable and could be seen as part of a moral system.

But see, it's not just women. You'll notice even the softer men will for example be more inclined to just care unconditionally for their kids than, say, discipline them when they mess up. And when society as a whole becomes more feminine, usually when it reaches a certain degree of peace and prosperity as you say, it also becomes more accepting of things that women in general tend to be more tolerant of, like homosexuality, for better or for worse. I mean you see today the polls about views on homosexuality in America, and you'll see the women more tolerant of it than men, but the tolerance for it is still at an all-time high for both sexes, which suggests society as a whole has become more "feminine", for lack of a better term. Because when you contrast that to just two centuries ago, the women were sometimes reported as being even harsher than men in punishing homosexuals:

The Vere Street Coterie were a group of men arrested at a molly house in Vere Street, London in 1810 for sodomy and attempted sodomy. Eight men were eventually convicted. Two of them were hanged and six were pilloried for this offence.

The pillorying took place in the Haymarket on 27 September that year. The six men arrived to the stocks covered with excrement after their journey through London in an open cart. The crowds who turned out to witness the scene were violent and unruly, throwing various objects (including rotten fish, dead cats, excrement, "cannonballs" made of mud, and vegetables) at the convicted men. The women in the crowd were reported as being particularly vicious. The city provided a guard force of 200 armed constables, half of them mounted and the other half on foot, to protect the men from even worse mistreatment.

John Hepburn (46) and Thomas White (16, drummer boy) were hanged at Newgate Prison on 7 March 1811.

At first glance, that doesn't sound much like women, right? Being staunch in preserving a certain social order (in this case sexual order), the macro, that's a man thing. But then you look at rate of married women back then in that Victorian era, with paintings depicting fathers kicking daughters with bastard babies out of the house and all, and how many of those who were married had many children throughout their lifetime, and you'd understand how they'd end up adopting their husbands' and mens' morality, sometimes even more staunchly than the men themselves. Oh and speaking of that painting, it represents another good example of men's general order- and authority-based morality vs. women's care-based one.

Same with the sufragettes and other feminist movements later on. You'll see the opposition from the 'respectable married women from respectable society' being just as vehement as the support from feminist-minded women. And this is still the case even today. Married women statistically are more conservative than single women including single mothers, and a more striking constrast would probably emerge if they polled women who see their 'relationships going somewhere', though that's a little hard to control for.

I mean if you look at those white nationalist gatherings, groups and all, you'd think a blood-and-soil stance is a typically masculine one and so you wouldn't expect finding women and girls in it, and yet you will find a small number of them. Are these women all following the ideology of the men in their lives? Probably. Though some seem to just be nationalistic (or libertarian, or whatever other typically male leaning) on their own, and so they end up revolving around men in those currents. Because make no mistake, women like that do exist, even when they're single and unattached. Like take Ann Coulter. The other day I watched her talk about single motherhood to a bunch of single mothers, and she was like, "Single motherhood is bad because boys born to it are much more likely to be X, Y, and Z." And the women on the other side kept repeating, "But my experience is this, I love my kid so much bla bla" and Coulter was like, "Yeah but the overall impact on society ain't good, and your kid is still likely to be X, Y, and Z," and the other women kept on focusing on the harm she was doing by stigmatizing single mothers, how they're feeling bad and all. And here's the interesting thing, the dude there, the host, was a softie himself so was like leveling the same feminine arguments. That's when it hit me, Ann is more of a man than this dude! So there is overlap between the sexes, Coulter may be feminine in sex but she's somewhere in the masculine side of the gender spectrum.

And that wasn't her sole "masculine" position. I remember when there was talk about deporting illegal immigrants, many years ago, in the Obama era, her argument was clear-cut: "Because it's the law. There needs to be only one path to immigration, a legal path, and that's it." Likewise, legalism, and the desire the enforce the law and keep a certain order is also a typically masculine one. Contrast that with women and softer men who wail against police brutality, which often times is just police using the necessary force to subdue an arrestee. This whole concept of law is lost on them, and the further left you go, the least sense it makes to them. Like when those scrawny anarchists start vandalizing and assaulting people, they don't get the police reaction, they see police stopping them as fascists, and you see in the comment sections the females either remaining silent or encouraging them. The whole concept of laws and rules, and rule of law, has always bugged people on the left side of morality. Just like capitalism and property, they accept it begrudgingly.

On this issue, the other day I was exchanging comments with someone on YT, and I'm like, "Why bother make laws and clear paths to citizenship if one can just cross the border and get it?" And the other guy was like, "Yeah but he already crossed it, he's already here!" And I'm like "Yeah but can't you see that pardoning him would undermine the whole legal thing, it would make a joke of it.." I don't know, I want clear-cut laws and rules and I want them well enforced, and many people it's like they don't care. And here's the thing, I'm not even against immigration in general. It's like, you want to increase the number of immigrants, fine, let's consider increasing the quotas and make the legal doors larger. And it's not just this, like when many people say "Oh I hope this guys gets tortured in prison" or something, what does that mean, that you think his sentence wasn't long enough, that punishment doesn't fit the crime? In which case, why not simply advocate for longer sentences, why accept a system in which he doesn't get his due sentence and you're just left hoping his fellow prisoners act as judge jury and executioners and do something to him? It's stupid. Though when you push many of those "I hope he gets killed/raped/beaten up good in the house" folks on whether they want actual longer sentence, they're like "nah that's too long", it's like, "Make up your fucking mind!"

The whole concept of due process is lost on so many lefties, you see many women call for a prosecution of rape where pretty much all you need to lock someone up is say "I was raped."

Oh man I went on so many tangents, but sometimes when I get going I don't stop. Anyway here's what I suggest, you should make one of those "Read more" buttons so that comments like this don't appear fully except to those who want to read them in full and don't eat up the whole section.

You have an article on how to be a strong man, but what are the signs that a man is weak?

The ones that I have though immoral were the ones who wouldn't let me move on after they did (although I now believe they were trying to make me jealous.)

Hey Chase, what were some of the businesses you made for your girlfriends that they could take over?

I looked up turnkey business and I seen a website charging thousands of dollars for businesses.

I'd rather do it on my own and sell them to people.

What were the businesses you built for them? I just want to know so I can look up how I can build multiple businesses.

2) can you still do good with younger and older women if you're an older man without wealth, being famous, having your own business managing people, or even being higher up in mangement?

I ask because what if an older man is just starting to date, but he doesn't have any of this? Should he not waste his time? What could he do?

3) if I'm not the smartest, how can I build wealth that you speak of that older men should have? I don't feel I'm smart Enough To run my own business, or even become a higher up manger.

I feel I'm dumb as rocks and I have zero skills. If there's a way you could tell me to do those things even though I'm not the smartest, I will do it, what should I look up? I have zero idea on what to purse.

4. I seen a comment here talking about weak man signs.

I was going to ask a question like this, what are weak man mental traits? What are weak man habits that are behind close doors?

When I say behind doors, I mean you can act and look like you're strong to other people, but I feel you have to be like that behind the scenes to make it real.

I feel that weak man signs are, complaining, masturbating, watching porn, having oneitis.

Tell me if my examples are right, and please do add more to the list and what should men do that is strong at all times.

Thanks man!

So I just read the winner effect Chase, and wanted to ask about the last part.

"If you want to make a lot of money, do a lot of cool things, and sleep with a lot of pretty girls, this is probably one of the most important things you will ever do for yourself:

You need to learn how to be a dominant man."

I have a long ring finger almost matching my middle finger, my index is normal, and my fingers are really long.

My problem is, I have always had low pay and I only had a few women, and I have always have been quiet and timid my whole life, I've been very scared of risk too.

The very opposite of high testosterone, I know things aren't absolutes, but the way I've been my whole life you would think I was very below average with testosterone.

Then u think I may have high testosterone and maybe have jerked it all away. Is that even possible? I've been doing that since I was little and I have always been the way I have. But I was like how I described before I started rubbin It out too. So idk.

During childhood, I wacked off so much that I wanted only the best looking girls and never had that drive to go after girls who I thought were just attractive enough to get a nut off, I never played sports or did anything, I never was smart, I just drifted through life. I always was just trying to get by, I never had any kind of goals. I never partied at all or had a lot of friends. I went to school and went home and did it all over again. In college as well. I feel so bad that I wasn't good at anything or even tried out for anything. There's so many girls I could have had sex with, I'm so bad with school work that I am so mad at myself for not taking up sports. I realize that if I'm dumb, I could at least go hard at sports, then I could go to college for free and become a millionaire, I could of been the badest rapper and been rich off that, but all I did was try to get by, now I'm stuck with no money, no women, no talent.

Do you think that this happened because of excessive masturbation? Did I jerk off all of my drive and winner effect ? Is that even possible to do? Becoming a person who drifted through life because of one thing?

That was one of my questions, but my main question I want to know is how I can "win" a lot money, do a lot of cool things, and sleep with a lot of girls?

How do I win these things? I read the part about doing things on your own terms, but that hasn't gotten me money, girls, or to do cool things.

Could you please explain how I can "win" and become "dominant" to get these things with examples ? I feel I can win these things withoutnot being smart or talented, I just have no idea on how to win them.

How does one "win" and be "dominant" to make a lot of money, cool things to do, and girls?

I'm really focused on the money part and cool things. With girls I can imagine you would read this wonderful site, but how would you win a lot of money or win to be able to do cool things?

I want to take all of these things I told you I have been all of these many years, and change! I want to erase them and become the man I want to be, the man who wins!

Tell me what I need to do and I will do it, I want to Win!

P.S. I read your article about things to do before you turn 35, great article.

Do you feel once you're 30 or 35 you should give up on things that you listed, or your dreams in life? Is that the point where you just give up? Do you believe a person should give something up because they haven't reached it at the age ? Or does it just go away on its own?

I ask because I fear if I don't have many things down by then, it'll be too late to enjoy life and I end up like everyone else and will never achieve happiness.

I Want to be a better man.

Thanks so much Chase.