Are Gorgeous Women More Difficult than Cute or Pretty Ones? | Girls Chase

Are Gorgeous Women More Difficult than Cute or Pretty Ones?

Chase Amante

Hey! Chase Amante here.

You've read all the free articles I can offer you for this month.

If you'd like to read more, I've got to ask for your help keeping the lights on at Girls Chase.

Click a plan below to sign up now and get right back to reading. It's only 99¢ the first month.

Already a GirlsChase.com subscriber? Log in here.

Hector Castillo's picture

gorgeous women
Some guys will tell you to get a beautiful girl, treat her the same as any girl. Good advice, but it’s worth keeping in mind: she isn’t, actually, the same as any girl.

Uh, yeah. Duh.

But every so often, I’ll hear some guy say something like “You should just treat that girl like she’s a 7.”

To an extent, I agree, but that doesn’t mean that if you walk up to any stunner on the street and treat her like you would any other girl, you’re automatically going to sleep with her.

Your initial cockiness might intrigue her and get you to the hook point, but very quickly she’s going to find out if you’re really as good as you pretend to be. And if you’re not her superior, she will quickly expose you.

Comments

Kevin Bogard's picture

Great article!

What do you mean by huntress though?

Author
Hector Castillo's picture

A Huntress is a female player, a woman who goes out to find men and is even aggressive about it. These girls give VERY obvious signs of interest, like walking next to you and staring at you when you turn to them, or even approaching you themselves. My most recent ex-girlfriend was one (we dated in college; my book King of College details our relationship) and I also dated a girl from mid 2016-early 2017 who was one. I met her at the airport. She stood next to me on the bus to the plane and when I turned to her, she was staring at me. I turned away, turned back, and she was still staring at me. Within a few minutes of conversation she mentioned blowjobs.

Girls like that.

Vermin's picture

Hey, Hector How's it going my man? Hope you're good!

There was one thing about the article that I wanted to talk about. When you say gorgeous/beautiful women I'm pretty sure you're referring to women who have grown up there whole lives being treated as if they were beautiful? Because the problem I see is that she might be beautiful to you but I might think she's just average. She might be a 9 to you but to me she only a 5 or a THOT.

Let's say I approach a girl who to me is just average but her whole life she's been treated as if she was very beautiful, that's gonna make it way harder isn't it because towards me she's gonna act like a beautiful girl would even tho I think she's pretty basic.

So is that what it comes down to in the end? She was raised as if she was an absolute stunner and then that's how she ends up acting like. How was she raised is all that matters right, cos then that determines how she acts?

Vermin

Author
Hector Castillo's picture

You're telling me the girl on the left of this article's photo is a 5 or a THOT? If so, your version of anything above a 7 exists in some heavenly realm. I salute you for dating deities.

Also, it's only slightly relevant if she was "treated as if she was beautiful." If she wasn't, it will affect her self-esteem somewhat, but most gorgeous women I know have always been treated very well. Perhaps they earned karma in a previous life to reap this life of treatment and worship, but beautiful women are treated well because they're beautiful.

So when you say this -

"Let's say I approach a girl who to me is just average but her whole life she's been treated as if she was very beautiful, that's gonna make it way harder isn't it because towards me she's gonna act like a beautiful girl would even tho I think she's pretty basic."

That's not what I'm talking about. I'm talking about beautiful and stunning women. Everyone has their tastes but beautiful women are usually agreed upon as beautiful, even if they're not your type.

"How was she raised is all that matters right, cos then that determines how she acts?"

Not really. Her upbringing affects her, but a beautiful girl, in most cases, knows she's beautiful. Yes, she's insecure like every other person on Earth is, but she's much more confident than a girl who's meh but treated well. In women, there is unfortunately no substitute for genuine beauty. I'd rather sleep with a beautiful girl who's a shitty person than a meh girl who has a wonderful personality. Who I date is a different story.

To put it simply, it's not the treatment they receive that makes them have high-standards. It's their beauty that causes the special treatment, which then makes them have high-standards. You can't reverse the causes.

If you're asking how to approach women with high-self esteem but who are just meh, I would suggest a slight asshole attitude, but still mostly respectful, since she might auto-reject if you treat her too shitty.

BMontana's picture

I kind of disagree heavily with that part.

"If women casually slept with their inferiors or equals, every chick would have lay counts in the triple or quadruple digits. We know that is not the case."

The numbers are still high enough though actually more than men's numbers of lays.

"Despite the “cock carousel” myth of the Red Pill and Manosphere communities, it’s rare for a girl to have above fifty lays – even well into her thirties – let alone a hundred or more."

So you call 50 lays low and the cock carousel a myth? This sounds like reverse psychology. I bet 90% of the guys you know are not even close to 50 lays, yet for the average woman it's considered a low count. lol

"I personally know only a handful of women still in their 20s who are in the triple digits, and I’ve met a lot of women."

And again, you think 5 women with that amount of sexual experience are a low number? Obviously most women will never tell you how many men they have had sex with.

If you say beautiful women are hard to get, then yes that sounds realistic and I would think they hook up with like 3-4 partners at best. However you contradict yourself by actually telling the truth, that women in their 20 have already high amounts of sexual partners which then kind of makes me doubt the whole she needs a "superior" guy. In my experience women sleep with many men, no matter how beautiful they are.

Author
Hector Castillo's picture

>So you call 50 lays low and the cock carousel a myth

I didn't say that's low. I used 50 as a random, extreme number. I don't know many women who are even close to that.

>And again, you think 5 women with that amount of sexual experience are a low number? Obviously most women will never tell you how many men they have had sex with.

If your premise is "Women never tell the truth and you'll never know how many men they sleep with," that's fine, but don't make estimates on either side. If you don't know but claim they're all high-partner count sluts, it's just as logically fallible as saying, "I don't know..they're all virgins!"

It's called the appeal to ignorance. If you want to hold the logical high-ground, you stay neutral and simply claim ignorance.

" However you contradict yourself by actually telling the truth, that women in their 20 have already high amounts of sexual partners which then kind of makes me doubt the whole she needs a "superior" guy."

I never said women in their 20's have a high partner count.

You're living in a different universe than me. Which is fine. Enjoy it. You claim women are sleeping with lots of men, but also claim you don't know. If you're not actually seeing her suck his dick or ride him, how do you know? I'm saying that my experience and my observations tell me women don't sleep with nearly as many men as we assume.

BMontana's picture

"I didn't say that's low. I used 50 as a random, extreme number. I don't know many women who are even close to that."

Well, it didn't sound like that because you said you didn't know too many women with a lay count of OVER 50, which sounds like women get close to that number anyway.

"If your premise is "Women never tell the truth and you'll never know how many men they sleep with," that's fine, but don't make estimates on either side. If you don't know but claim they're all high-partner count sluts, it's just as logically fallible as saying, "I don't know..they're all virgins!" "

That wasn't really my point. My point is, you know 5 women with more than hundred lays, while you make it sound as if it's a low number of women, those 5. I could say you make estimations as well by claiming that most women#s lays aren't high. That's why I said we will never know their lay numbers for sure.

"I never said women in their 20's have a high partner count."

I was just referring to your above 50 men comment.

"You're living in a different universe than me. Which is fine. Enjoy it. You claim women are sleeping with lots of men, but also claim you don't know. If you're not actually seeing her suck his dick or ride him, how do you know? I'm saying that my experience and my observations tell me women don't sleep with nearly as many men as we assume."

I think we have a different oppinion of what high and low numbers are. For you 30-50 lays might be average if you are in your 20s and 30s, for me it's a lot for women. I didn't say I didn't know how many men they sleep with, I was thinking it's more than we assume, since most men actually tend to underestimate a woman's lay count.

Author
Hector Castillo's picture

>I think we have a different oppinion of what high and low numbers are. For you 30-50 lays might be average if you are in your 20s and 30s, for me it's a lot for women. I didn't say I didn't know how many men they sleep with, I was thinking it's more than we assume, since most men actually tend to underestimate a woman's lay count.

I just tried to explain that 30-50 lays is super high. I don't know how to make that any clearer. Most girls I know aren't even approaching the 20 mark, let alone 10 or 15.

>Well, it didn't sound like that because you said you didn't know too many women with a lay count of OVER 50, which sounds like women get close to that number anyway.

I'm clarifying it now.

Farhan's picture

Although I do agree stunning and gorgeous women have high standards, you can't just put the effect of tastes in the trash. I've spoke to a cr*p ton of friends on what we find hot, and this can differ a lot. Sure, a sexy body is pretty universal, but a hot face can vary a ton between people. My 10s are some 5s and 6s. What many guys on the internet find 10s I wouldn't touch with a stick. Albeit those cases are rare. It's true that most of the women that are considered hot like scarlet johanson or kate beckinsale are attractive, but at best they look likes 7s to me. I've looked at 100s of pictures of both and I wouldn't settle for any of them for a long term partner. Same with Margot Robbie, Pia Wurtzbach, any of them kardashian bitches, singers, actresses Etc. Of the top of my head I can at best name 10 woman I find gorgeous. In terms of 10s, probably only Katherine Hiegl. I think it's appropriate to treat 10s like 7s and see past makeup, facial expressions, clothing etc. Sure these women aren't average, but most gorgeous women will pass people that find their faces just average every day.

Leave a Comment

One Date girl next to the number one

Get The Girl In Just One Date

It only takes one date to get the girl you want. Best of all, the date's easy to get… and girls love it.

Inside One Date, You'll Learn

  • How to build instant chemistry
  • Ways to easily create arousal
  • How to get girls to do what you want
  • The secret to a devoted girlfriend

…and more great Girls Chase Tech