
Men don’t always stick around for a relationship after sex. Is
this wrong and is there anything bad about it – or not?
On my Friday/Saturday night date post,
a female commenter took issue with my advice to a male commenter that
he take advantage of rebound sex to get over a harsh
relationship he just came out of.
To her point, I was perhaps a little indelicate in how I suggested
he do this (it was guy-to-guy talk; this is a men’s site, after all).
However, she took the occasion to launch into a moral argument that
casual sex hurts women, takes advantage of them, and uses and discards
them like unwanted objects. Her comment arguing this is a bit long to
quote (you can read her full
comment here), so I’ll just quote what is the most important part
to me:
“I
have had conversations with girlfriends who have told me that a guy
won’t go out with them if they don’t sleep with them. Women have been
conditioned to feel they have to have sex, much much sooner than they
would feel comfortable. We know from studies that men don’t develop the
feeling of love until at least 3-6 months into the relationship, even
while sleeping with a woman. What they develop are lust emotions.
Most women have given up on the idea of a man protecting them and
*actually* loving them. Valor and honor and real love for another is
almost absent in most dating. What you describe in your post is not
love at all. It is using people for sex, using people for the thrill of
feeling desires, of entertainment, but it is not love. You are
incredibly insightful with how to manipulate women to get to your
ultimate goal. What I am saying is that this is the opposite of what a
man of valor would do. He would protect his woman from physical
exploitation, not be the one to exploit her. And he is exploiting her,
even if it’s with her permission, when he is trying to extract sex from
her when he doesn’t even genuinely love her--- care for her best good.
It doesn’t much matter if rebound sex helps a person feel better. That
doesn’t make it right. Maybe we can just numb our conscience to the
point that it is dead so that we can pursue feelings of lust and
pleasure without caring what is actually loving to others?”
First off, her science is wrong. Men are more romantic than
women are, heal
less completely from breakups than women do, experience love at
first sight at
nearly double the rate of women...
and that immediate in-love love-at-first-sight feeling men get is not infatuation – relationships
that spring from immediate in-love feelings are every bit as stable
and likely to last as those that develop from slow build-ups.
But that’s beside the point.
Our commenter’s argument is that to sleep with her, then not see her
again, or not engage in or want to engage in a long-term committed
relationship with her is damaging to her. You hurt her, you injure her,
and you just generally make her feel bad.
So is she right? Does sex minus commitment lead to a trail of broken
hearts and cynical women?
The answer I’ll give you is “yes,
but.” And the ‘but’ is quite important.
But we’re not ready for the ‘but’ yet. Let’s talk about the ‘yes’
first.