Is the Search for a Pure Woman Quixotic? | Girls Chase

Is the Search for a Pure Woman Quixotic?

Chase Amante

Hey! Chase Amante here.

You've read all the free articles I can offer you for this month.

If you'd like to read more, I've got to ask for your help keeping the lights on at Girls Chase.

Click a plan below to sign up now and get right back to reading. It's only 99¢ the first month.

Already a GirlsChase.com subscriber? Log in here.

Alek Rolstad's picture

Many men seek purity in women. Some men view them as of higher value; as something beautiful. The idea of purity is very important, especially when a man is looking for a long term relationship.

pure woman

Now, personally I do not care for purity – in fact, purity for me is unattractive in the sense that it is incongruent with sexual liberalism. I enjoy female sexuality; I find it hot, sexy, and mysterious. It gives me so many kicks, you have no idea.

Comments

Anonymous's picture

Alek, to me it's another thing not exactly the fact that she enjoys sex. But if you look at CDC statistics and others you'll see that:

- girls having 6-10 sexual partners have 20% chance of having an STD
- girls having 11-15 sexual partners have 30% chance of having an STD
- girls having over 20 sexual partners have 42% chance of having and STD

These might be treatable STDs but it can be aids or something that sterilises you and you won't ever be able to have children. And for all those girls that you say in the US have had 20+ partners it's a lot worse than playing russian roulette - there you are screwed only 1 out of 6 times here you get to sleep with a girl with STD 2 out of 5 times.

Then the other issue about fidelity and marriage. Another statistic from the CDC and other official agencies:

- women with 0 premarital partners have 19% of divorce. 81% are in stable marriages.
- women with 1 premarital partner have 46% chance of divorce. 54% are in stable marriages.
- women with 16-20 premarital sexual partners have 82.5% of divorce. Only 17.5% are in stable marriages.

Some other:

- women with 16+ sexual partners have 52% chance of abortion before marriage.
- women with 0 premarital sexual partners have 59% to be happy.
- women with 5 sexual partners have 36% chance to be happy.
- women with 16+ sexual partners have 31% chance to be happy.

So it's not so much about being afraid of a her sexuality. It's more about your chances of stable relationship and especially for those that want marriage and kids.

And I agree that most girls nowadays have gone through 10 sexual partners by the time they are 20 and probably that number will get to 30-50 by the time they are in their late 20s the way things are going. But if you are a guy who want not to be cheated on, have a stable relationship with a stable girl you better find out her real number early on. And Chase has an article explaining how to do it.

Or you can come to Eastern Europe like the Ukraine or Russia, or Japan where you'll find plenty of old fashioned women who are smoking hot and have had very few(or any) sexual partners but are freaks once she falls for you. They are not the majority but it's not too difficult to find one if you try.

Franco Lombardi's picture

Anon,

Statistics (like the ones you've listed) have already been listed before on this website for similar subjects to the one Alek has discussed here. The problem with statistics is that they just show a correlation -- they don't actually show the cause of the problem.

So while you can make the assumption that the problem here is with WOMEN (because, statistically, it shows that women with more partners are less likely to stay married), it is also making the assumption that the women are the ones who are at fault.

Women who have had multiple partners have also had multiple experiences with sex -- both good and bad. When a girl has had multiple partners, but you as the man have been the MOST euphoric and amazing sexual experience she's ever had, she'll actually be MORE inclined to want to stay with you because she already knows what other sexual experiences have been like. If she knows that you're one in a million, then she's going to want to stay with you.

The problem with most men is that they don't understand how important the ACTUAL sexual experience is to a woman. Giving a woman a mediocre sexual experience is setting yourself up for self-destruction; if she happens to meet a man who can satisfy her needs better than you can, then why should she not have the freedom to do so? She is not your property. If you want her to stay with you, you have to give her a really good reason to do so.

So essentially what I am saying here is that most men do not strive to give women sexual experiences that supersede everything else she has ever had. Even a woman who has had 20+ different partners will suddenly chase down monogamy like a dog chasing a bone if she feels like the man is much more dominant and sexually open in the relationship than any other man she's been with. It is the MEN that generally lead to the statistics that you have listed.

I won't speak for Alek here and I would like to hear his response as well, but from my personal experiences with women, I've found very few correlations between women with lots of sexual experience and women who desire monogamy. The two are not as tied together as people want to believe. I HAVE found, however, that the QUALITY of the sexual experience (and the man who gave it to her) greatly affects her desire to lock him down in a long-term relationship.

- Franco

Anonymous's picture

Okay the problems and cause for those problems are mostly: feminism and no fault divorce. When a woman can get a divorce whenever she wants and get half her mans money and alimony for life why not get a divorce the first time you get in a fight.

And you sound like a feminist honestly. "Women have no fault, men are to blame for bad relationships.". Well maybe you are right that the man is to blame for not being sexy enough but the woman is just as much to blame for being with a non sexy man. She chose him, she wan't kidnapped and forced to be with him.

And to the fact that YOU have found very few correlations does not mean that there aren't - this is just your experience with women. But you didn't touch on the statistics about STDs, which tell me something. And there has been some research that shows that having 20 sexual partners is a sign that a girl has baggage. Daddy issues, has been raped, sexually abused, low self esteem, lack of self control, substance abuse, etc. Of course that's not all women but most normal 20 year old girl haven't been banged by 2 football (what you call soccer) teams. And some other studies show that more sexual partners leave psychological issues in some women.

My final thought is that even if you are right about the number of her sexual partners doesn't matter. I and every guy out there still have the right to chose the women I date by whatever standarts I want. Especially if you're an attractive guy you can be as discriminative as you want. And if you want a girl that is a virgin or has had very few sexual partners, it's still possible to find one. It's your preference to don't mind if your girlfriend or wife has slept with 200 men before you but some men will mind and it's perfectly fine. Remember just as it's your responsibility to be attractive so a girl will like you, it's her responsibility to be attractive so you like her. And women are and have always been far more shallow than we men are.

Franco Lombardi's picture

"Okay the problems and cause for those problems are mostly: feminism and no fault divorce. When a woman can get a divorce whenever she wants and get half her mans money and alimony for life why not get a divorce the first time you get in a fight."

"And you sound like a feminist honestly. "Women have no fault, men are to blame for bad relationships.". Well maybe you are right that the man is to blame for not being sexy enough but the woman is just as much to blame for being with a non sexy man. She chose him, she wan't kidnapped and forced to be with him."

That's a pretty negative mindset you have there. If you believe that women only get married to men to gain from the divorce, then you probably will never lead a happy life with women. Hopefully you'll learn something from this website so that that negative (and false) view is put behind you.

While there are women who may divorce a man in part to take his property, the LARGE majority of women marry with the intention of being together with a man they are in love with. Whether or not the man continues to be the same "man" that she married is a different story; I'd say the majority of divorces enacted by women stem from the man getting lazy and no longer taking care of her major needs -- needs that she feels like she might be able to find elsewhere.

Likewise, there are men who also divorce women because they let themselves go (i.e. perhaps the woman begins to put on weight during the marriage whereas before she would keep herself fit and good-looking, or maybe she gets lazy about doing the things she used to do for him).

"And to the fact that YOU have found very few correlations does not mean that there aren't - this is just your experience with women. But you didn't touch on the statistics about STDs, which tell me something. And there has been some research that shows that having 20 sexual partners is a sign that a girl has baggage. Daddy issues, has been raped, sexually abused, low self esteem, lack of self control, substance abuse, etc. Of course that's not all women but most normal 20 year old girl haven't been banged by 2 football (what you call soccer) teams. And some other studies show that more sexual partners leave psychological issues in some women."

These are still all assumptions you are making based off of research statistics/percentages. I am speaking from personal experience as a guy who has no trouble making women fall in love with him -- as a matter of fact, I find it pretty easy to do (whereas I have other "weakness areas" in seduction that I would love to improve upon).

The number of sexual partners a woman has does not necessarily correlate to her having relationship issues. A girl who can't maintain a healthy relationship, however, might indicate that she has relationship issues. There can be girls who've slept with over 20 guys who weren't interested in a relationship with any of those men, but then could be perfectly fine for a healthy, long-term relationship with the next man she meets. And there are girls who may have only been with 5 guys in total but entered into a toxic relationship with each one where she either engaged with the wrong (abusive) type of men or brought down chaos in relationships where the guys were relatively stable/normal. This could be linked to prior family/relationship baggage.

You can't draw conclusions from the numbers because they don't tell you the whole story. In general, women who have more sexual partners are more difficult to satisfy simply because they have more experience with men. So unless you're at her level of experience (or preferably higher), you're going to have a difficult time maintaining her interest.

My final thought is that even if you are right about the number of her sexual partners doesn't matter. I and every guy out there still have the right to chose the women I date by whatever standarts I want. Especially if you're an attractive guy you can be as discriminative as you want. And if you want a girl that is a virgin or has had very few sexual partners, it's still possible to find one. It's your preference to don't mind if your girlfriend or wife has slept with 200 men before you but some men will mind and it's perfectly fine. Remember just as it's your responsibility to be attractive so a girl will like you, it's her responsibility to be attractive so you like her. And women are and have always been far more shallow than we men are.

Yes, you do have the right to choose to not have relationships with women who have had many partners. If you want partner count to be one of the things that you screen for, then no one is going to stop you. However, do not make the assumption that a woman who has a lot of partners is unfit for a long-term relationship -- it is simply not true, and only a lot of experience with women (such as Alek, Chase, and I have) will show you otherwise.

Ironically, you'll find that the men who consider women to not be "shallow" are generally the ones who are sleeping with lots of them. If you understand the way they think and where their insecurities lie, you'll find that, for the most part, they are just innocent beings trying to live a happy life in this world.

- Franco

joongoon's picture

Your right. Women don't magically get worse when they have multiple sexual partners. If you do further research on the topic you will probably find out a shocking correlation between childhood trama and a lack of successful relationships. Do you think a girl with an incredible relationship with her parents will have the same success in a relationship when compared to a girl who has faced corporal punishment and other forms of abusive situations? What about a girl who went through the divorce of her parents; do you think she will have a good understanding of what makes an ideal relationship?

Some people need to deal with the problems in their past before they can ever achieve success in the present. If a girls relationships in the past have been toxic then only a niave person would believe she has a good grasp of what a real relationship is. After all, sex is only a means to an end, the end being love. But some people turn worldly things into a way to deal with past truma. A girl who lusts for sex probably really wants a relationship that offers her more than pain and misery but doesn't understand that sex is simply a tool which builds a relationship. Instead she believes that sex will fill the gap in her heart when it will only leave a bigger hole then the previous one. Until she has the knowledge of this then good men will ultimately stay away from her.

(Same goes for men)

Franco Lombardi's picture

joongoon,

I agree for the most part. The women that are going to have the most trouble maintaining a health relationship are the ones who had to endure toxic relationships while growing up, whether that be friends, family, or themselves.

Most girls may not even be able to deal with this type of past and never really turn their lives around, which is why we advise most men to screen for this type of woman and avoid her. It's not worth your time to deal with her issues when there are plenty of healthy-minded women out there who give you a much better relationship (and can be just as attractive as well).

Although, not all women who "lust" for sex are looking to fill a gap in their heart, either. Sometimes women just want to enjoy sex for what it is, and that's completely fine. But you'll find that most of these women want to enjoy it with specific types of men that turn them on sexually, even if they know those men aren't fit for long-term relationships. However, if a woman comes across a man she finds not only sexually desirable but also suitable for something longer term, the majority of the time she will chase that down.

This is why setting expectations clearly with women is important. If you want to just be a guy that gives her a great experience in the bedroom, then that's perfectly fine as long as she realizes that. Just make sure to screen her early for the type of woman she is and what she's looking for so that you two aren't waging and unnecessary battle of expectations.

- Franco

Anonymous's picture

Statistics mean nothing..

You have to take into consideration the society in which you live in.

Good point you have in your last paragraph, as that speaks volumes about the cultures in societies in the West compared to those in the East.

I live in the Balkans and here people are rather conservative, and when a woman gets divorced she is automatically scratched away from society.

People are uber judgmental here and normal things in the West aren`t considered normal things here.
That is one of the many things i hate about the Balkans, the constant need to follow certain social behavior.

Again i stress not just about sex, seduction, STDs, but about every other thing possible and that is "statistics mean nothing"

Just watch the movie "Kinsey" and you`ll see more clearly.
You will see just how many things women and men have hidden and have done in secrecy, just so the society won`t judge them..

I agree with Alek and Franco on this one.

Author
Alek Rolstad's picture

Thank you for your comment.

I compared to others here have more faith in statistics. however, this research prooves nothing for many reasons:

1) The first thing you learn in statistics is that responses to questions related to privacy, such as "how many partner have you had" or anything related to someone sex life are inkonsistitent.

2) Women would usually lie about how many sex partners them have had. They usually tell a number that is lower than their actual count.

3) Women usually lie about their relationships - in public, they usually say its better than it atually is.

Beside the many methodical issues here, I believe there is some truth in these researches.

Virgins or women who have had a few sex partner are usually very ugly. By this I believe there is a huge correlation between her looks and the stability of her marriage, as she doesn't have many other options. I live in the western world and i have yet met a singel hot virgin.

Another reason girls with low sex partner are less likely to cheat is because she probably is from a very conservative background. Hence, being "married" (that is a rather "conservative" arrangement") will lead to her happiness. A girl that is not so conservative will see no hapiness, or at least less happiness in being in a conservative relationship. however i see no correlation between the numbers of sex partner and happiness. all I see is a lot of spuriosity.

5) You haven't listed neither a theoretical nor a operational definition of your variables: happiness, stable marriages etc.

- What a one refers to as a stable marriage might be defined differently by someone else. Samt goes for the many definitions of a normative term such as happiness.

I could proabably write all night, but i see no point unless I am linked to the actual paper (where i might see a theoretical and operational definition of the variables)

But the bottom line is: women will always lie about how many they have had sex with and will always try to come accross as as pure as possible. Using condoms also help minimize the risks of STD's.

This minimizes the validity of the statistics you just posted.

But it also makes it almost impossible for you as a man to find "such pure woman".

About the STD things: I agree, girls who have fucked more have more chances of getting an STD, that seems obvious. But I don't see this as a big problem as most STD's are curable. Those STD's that sterilizes you can be cured VERY easily. According to my doctor it is very rarely that chlamydia and mycoplasmas lead to sterility. If you test yourself regularly, which you should (even if you have only fucked one "pure woman") then you are safe.

About Eastern Europe: I love Eastern Europe. I visit this part of Europe every year. However all places are different, but all those countries shares on thing in common: hot girls. The other awesome thing is that those women seem are very sexually liberated.

Those girls were really far from old fashioned.

And Japan is probably the kinkiest place on earth. No place has more sexually liberated women than Japan :)

-Alek

Anonymous's picture

Lets say you're right and every attractive 20 year old girl has been passed around by a whole soccer team. It doesn't mean that there aren't more conservative women that are attractive. Even Ricardus spoke of one (that comes to my mind) that was 24 years old and gorgeous dancer that was a virgin. It's not possible if you are a high status man/sexy.

As for Japan, sex is a real issue there. There might be a kinky people and porn but 25% of men and 50% of women say that they despise sex. It's so bad that they expect till the year 2085-2100 their population to drop from 125 million people to 45 million people, because men and women aren't having sex and relationships. (you can google it cause there are a lot of links and I'm not sure if it's allowed to post link on GC)

And if all else fails you can still date inexperienced women - just date 14-15-16 year old girls. It's Europe 14 is legal for sex. And a lot of girls around 16 are a lot more mature than you think. Plus you have the pleasure of teaching her about sex and pleasures. And as a rule of thumb never date a woman that is over 27-8 y/o. Only exception is if you're a loser you can try them because women's biological clocks are going crazy when they approach 30 and haven't found a nice provider to raise her children.

And never ever ever ever ever date a single mother under no circumstances not even if she has a magical vagina.

Anonymous's picture

I will never get into a long-term relationship with a woman who has had 20 partners; that's insane (at least until I reach that level). If I haven't had much sexual experience I shouldn't need to settle for a girl that has had more sexual partners just because there are no "pure girls." Plus, girls that have had more sexual experience are way more likely to cheat on you than those who have little. That's a fact. For this reason, even Chase has said that he only gets into long-term relationships with conservative girls that have had 0-3 partners tops.

Author
Alek Rolstad's picture

Hi. Yeah seems like a good idea. I wouldn't enter a relationship with a girl that has had way more sex partners than I have. I would feel worthless and of lower "sexual" value around her.

Although 20 partners isn't much. if you want a good looking girlfriend (or even average looking), then you need to accept the fact she has had at least 10 sex partners - unless she comes from a very conservative background.

"Plus, girls that have had more sexual experience are way more likely to cheat on you than those who have little."

Why do you think that?

I would say it's the opposite. At least that is what my experience tells me.

-Alek

Anonymous's picture

So, you don't agree with Chase's article "How Many Partners Has Your Girlfriend Had? Find Out Here." There he says that the higher the partner count, the more likely a girl is to have less qualms about cheating on her partner. They simply get used to novelty.

And how do you know that your experience tells you the opposite? You can never really be sure if a girl has cheated on you or not. Girls simply get better at hiding it as they gain more experience. Another factor I think is craziness. The more crazy a girl is, the more likely she is to cheat on you (even if she's had few partners).

Correct me if I'm wrong, but you seem like the kind of guy who does night game more than day game. If that's the case, then the women you meet are definitely more experienced than average girls who don't go to clubs.

Anonymous's picture

I'd like an answer to this as well. It might in Alex's case that the women with low partner count with whom he had dealt with were on the second stage of the "sexual cycle" (curious). And the women whom he thinks are not cheating him might be gaming him, like you said.

This article does paint a cynical, dichotomous portrait of conservative/pure (attractive) girls in the west though, suggesting they may not really exist as they are lying, or that they may be unbreakable in their mindset.

But it could be because of his unwillingness to date "pure" girls :)

And because Chase asserts the opposite, I'm guessing that's why he lives in China.

joongoon's picture

i think you should look up some information on number of sex partners and divorce. I know some studies show that women who only had 1 partner (their husband) have a 70% chance for a successful marriage. Simply increasing that number from 1 to 2 drops that percentage by 20 percantage points.

http://freenortherner.com/2013/06/21/sexonomics-odds-of-divorce/

Of course this is correlation. But it's still important. If long term relationships are the goal then you can greatly increase the odds of success by looking for women with lower sexual partners.

Author
Alek Rolstad's picture

This research has very low validity and reliability:

1) The reasons are because the majority they have interviewed are religious.

2) Majority of the participants have low to little education - hence most likely marriying at an early age.

3) most likely people of very conservative backgrounds:

Age Of First Marriage

<18: 48%
18-19: 40%
20-24: 29%
25+: 24%

4) Questions related to peoples sexual life has low validity.

Someone else listed similare studies in the comment section. I recommend you reading it. In this response I have listed why I don't believe there is any correlation between the variables listed.

-Alek

Vester's picture

i agree with this one, i never really believe on women being pure but i encountered a woman who was certified pure, a virgin at the age of 30. she told me, she remained pure and at guard always for the past 30 years because she is a good girl with principles in life, but her 30 years of being pure was just taken after 1 week of going out with me, and she just cant believe it that it happened to fast, and she is currently in a relationship with me now and it seems that she just had her sexual awakening, she has become so eager to make me cum, because she always had multiple orgasms if she's with me and she felt upset because she cant make me cum at the same time with her..

Author
Alek Rolstad's picture

Yeah, i have heard similar stories. We humans crave sex, its a biological drive. We can't act like it's not there.

-Alek

Anonymous's picture

So would a woman who watched porn but has never slept with a man still be considered pure?

Author
Alek Rolstad's picture

Well she would in a psychological research.

I knew a girl once who had never had sex but who had sucked at least 20 dicks. This way she remained a virgin till the age of 20 where she met the boyfriend she married.

-Alek

Anonymous's picture

Alek, im male 23, only slept with one girl my whole life. I have read Nancy Friday's My Secret Garden, and many other books. However, during and after reading this, i felt emotions of despair, grief, jealousy, and well other bad emotions. My family is very christian conservative so i've been fighting my old beliefs, but i still feel terrible sometimes. I know full well women love sex. But maybe since i feel i will never get all those sexual experiences that women do when they have tons of sex with tons of guys, i get overwhelming jealous, maybe its just cuz i want to have those experiences, but i feel like i am not able to. I will reread this again, i guess making myself upset at this is good cuz i'm stetching my belief system more.
Thanks.

Author
Alek Rolstad's picture

Hi there. I totally understand your frustration.

But there is still hope. Learn the art of seduction and move to a target rich area. Practice your skill and enjoy the many pleasures that has been kept away from you for so long.

I have heard many stories of men from similare background to you, who have succeed at this game.

So there are no reasons for you to not make it.

-Alek

Hashim's picture

No matter what any one says the fact is that a virgin lady is most likely over 90 percent be a long life wife material.
A good example is here in Kenya where over 80 percent of marriages in north eastern and in lamu at the coast tend to involve virgin ladies and out of it 90 % of then remain stable .Only about 5% end up in break ups.
On the other hand in Nairobi and central Kenya it the reverse.about only 5% involve virgin ladies of which 98% remain stable forever and the other 95 % do not involve any virgins and about 80 % end up in break ups some times less than 2 years after marriages.
Most of these break ups are caused by infidelity and adultery issues ie up to 80%.
What i am trying to bring up is that a virgin lady who has fallen in love for the first time in marriage is likely to take care of that marriage no matter the huddles unlike a lady who isnt a virgin.A lady who isn't a virgin has a mental notion of even if she doesnt be in marriage she can be satisfied by any other man so she wont care when getting out of the marriage.
Finally No man would would to marry a lady and end up without a kid of his own genetic composition unless he is abnormal.The main reason of you being on earth other than other reasons is for you to continue out your species lineage by having more new born so that you don't end up to species extinction.I am a medical pathologist and am finishing up gynecological studies and the truth of the matter that some men from western countries are trying to cover is that ladies who are virgins tend to have very low chances of about 0.03% of acquiring std as com[pared to those who aren't virgins.So of then even have abortions that make them impotent and when you marry such a lady you end up being fooled.
What i advise and what i have been advising many Kenyan youth in Kenya is in-order for them to have stable marriages they have to marry virgin ladies or pure ladies.I advise many ladies to preserve there virginity for there respective marriages.
Lastly i as an Iranian man and also other Asian and African men its very easy to trust a virgin lady who you are married to up to 100%of your trust than a lady who isn't a virgin

Author
Alek Rolstad's picture

Now onto the one million dollar question:

How do you know that a woman is a virgin? How do most men know wether or not the girl they are interacting to are virgins.

I am actually curious.

-Alek

Anonymous's picture

What matters most is the perceived effort a partner will put in the relationship. This means having the right expectations. When wanting something longterm then people will look for purity. It's the best predictor for character and someone's values. You instantly get an idea when talking (dirty or not), going out (alcohol), behaviour towards strangers (flirty), children (likes them or not). Now, there is a good chance that during her youth she had many sexual partners and is now willing to be exclusive, but before you can trust her on her word, a lot of time will pass! And people don't like having their time and effort wasted. Their is some truth in this article. But purity matters.

Author
Alek Rolstad's picture

Hi there. I agree to a certain extent.

Wether or not purity matters is up to each of us. That is an individual choice. The main message of this post is that finding pure women is hard, because there are no ways to tell who is pure and who is not, considering that women lie about their sex life.

Therefore it might be a better solution to look out for other things when looking for a gf?

-Alek

Anonymous's picture

Finding a virgin lady is easier.It all depends on you being fast to notice a lady who is a virgin since it involves a broad spectrum of characteristics depending on different virgin ladies and also regions.
As well no matter what pure and virgin ladies make perfect wives no matter what.In Iran and Kenya earlier marriages from the 20th century lasted much longer that current marriages a major reason being most girls at that time were virgins and got married while virgins.It was as well a taboo to loose virginity before marriage.
This lead to discipline and longer lasting marriages
On the part of disease its a fact that ladies who aren't virgins stand a risk of above 50% getting stds.
One can say they are curable but this may not be the sense eg Neisseria gonorrhea is developing resistance to antibiotics daily .Now what happens if one gets a complex double strain so this bacteria and is a lady?This ultimately can lead to inability to get pregnant.Same as chlamydia.Ladies tend to be reservoirs of this diseases and may not show early symptoms up to late stages thus leading to infertility.
HIV has no cure.

JWS's picture

I am 45 years old, been with well over 100 women, probably approaching 150 now. I have been in several long term, monogamous relationships, open relationships, and no relationship (i.e. one night stands, or occasional "fuckbuddies"). There are pros and cons to every type of relationship.

I'm a single dad, and not currently being in any serious, monogamous relationship is great for me and my two girls. They both have good mothers and an excellent father (me). Some nights I'm with my girls reading books or watching Shark Tank, other nights I'm out socializing or banging a GF or a stranger. I have never been happier! I have a lot of friends, but I enjoy my quiet time too. I can go where I want, when I want, and with whomever I want.

The problem with guys assuming that lifelong monogamy is always better in all circumstances is they are too narrow minded. The whole logic rests on a shaky premise. I have married friends and single friends, and there is no discernible difference between their happiness and their sexual preferences or state of relationship. This goes for women as well. I know many married women who are not as happy as their single friends. I know people with children who are miserable, people with kids who are happy, people without kids who are miserable or happy.

So the QUALITY of your relationships is important, but the strict, rigid definition of the TYPE of relationship is not so important. If I had boys instead of girls my life would be very different. But I would still be just as happy.

In summary, when someone says that a woman with less sexual partners is less likely to get divorced, I say "so what?" What if you or the woman gets bored of the other one and wants to try new things during a short lifetime? Maybe cultural or religious beliefs are holding you back from being as happy as you could be.

Pff's picture

You obviously don't know a thing about women, Alex. I know a lot of pure girls, while your experience is limited by one-night stands. Pitiful. :-/

Primalius's picture

Virgins for wives and sluts and former sluts for sex or for the beta males. It's the harsh truth but they are the leftovers for the beta males that will take anything given to them. Let everyone decide and don't shame them for it, but the truth is still the truth. If somebody wants a girl that slept with 20 guys, let him. If somebody wants a virgin only, let him. Girls lying about the number tells alot about what they think themselves of the situation. Everything has consequences!

Francis G's picture

If i'm ever going to commit, it is a REQUIREMENT that she is a VIRGIN. If she isn't then i'm only interested in sex. Microchimerism (dna from sperms from casual sex getting absorbed by the girl) means you are raising another mans child. If you want a long and stable relationship you need to start looking for a virgin.

Leave a Comment

One Date girl next to the number one

Get The Girl In Just One Date

It only takes one date to get the girl you want. Best of all, the date's easy to get… and girls love it.

Inside One Date, You'll Learn

  • How to build instant chemistry
  • Ways to easily create arousal
  • How to get girls to do what you want
  • The secret to a devoted girlfriend

…and more great Girls Chase Tech