How to Decipher Female Subcommunication, Part 2

This article would have been better if you gave examples

Now if only I could decipher Joseph W. South's writing maybe I'd have something for real! But seriously though this article makes no sense. Maybe some examples would've helped? Of like what does female subcommunication look like and how can I practice it as a man?

This article is very vague and touches on abstract notions that cannot be simply understood without inside experience. You only talk about the advantages of using "Womanes" but never properly define it. I would understand this language as "implying sexual conntation or underlying sexual tone without directly communiting it to her", which women do thoroughly enjoy. More examples and proper definition would have hepled this article more.

Hmm, strange I m really tired right now reading this in a secondary language and found it easy to read and relate to. Guess I got some reference points allready. I like your style a lot.

Hey man I like the article but could you add in some conversations examples of what this looks like. Also examples on when to go more masculine in conversation and when to go more feminine would help a lot, thanks!

This article and many articles before it speaks to me a ton of informative information about women. Therefore... I did plan to write a novel about a woman as the main character but I'm really having a lot of 2nd thoughts. It is the matter of can I write realistically about a woman even if I'm not a woman myself. Can women/men look up to this woman I've created for inspiration, since women are Subcommunicative creatures. Can a woman even be a leader and can charge into enemy territory like the famous Joan of Arc. Or is my female character is revolved around sexual appeal for all eternity. Would like some feedback, I had planned the plot within my mind for a long while now.

Before moving on to the next topic in this series, I strong recommend you do a How to Decipher Female Subcommunication, Part 2.5 with more concrete examples of some of the concepts that you discussed. Example dialogue!

For example you say: "you interpret what she says and put it through a Subcommunication Filter, as it were."
How to do this? What's the process to this effectively w/o misreading what she's saying/doing? What are some of the common things women/say sub-communicate that men should be on the lookout (BOLO) for?

You also say: "At times you will want to talk to women in a very masculine way, which means directly, succinctly, and logically. At other times, you will want to talk to women in the same manner that a female friend might."
What's an example dialogue that reflects this dynamic? Why does alternating between direct/indirect conversation arouse some women? Are we talking about saying one thing

Also you say: "You need to learn how to talk Womanese while at the same time keeping your focus on your masculine attitude. If you leave out the art of speaking in Womanese, you run the risk of becoming a cold, distant, and boring person in her eyes."
What's "Womanese? What does it look like and how to speak it/decipher it? Can you please provide example dialogue in which an abstract idea (like say a a person is attracted to another person, or wants to be in his/her company or whatever). How would that idea be conveyed in Womanese vs Manese? Consider including examples of other abstract ideas and the difference in how things are conveyed. What about during times of drama when a woman is behaving bad/illogical/not taking responsibility for her role etc. Is this a time to use Womanese and Manese?

You also say look for hidden sexual meaning in things women say. But even if you pick up on the hidden sexual meaning, particularly in the work place, how should a man best respond? Example dialogue please.

And to what extent do these examples of subcommunication and how to communicate with women and speak Womanese apply depending on ethnic background, location (i.e. city, country, etc?) And even within cities a venue on the street may require one kind of communication vs one-on-one like at work or at a bar, etc.

For example, regarding race: the style of "Womanese" of the typical white woman is different to that of the typical black American woman. Alot of black women aren't as subtle in their communication style, and directness and bold, blunt, brash, mixed with wit/humor works well with alot of them...but some white girls may be too intimidated by this and need a softer touch. What about Womenese when dealing with Hispanic women or American Asian women? What about Brazillian women or Far-east Asian women? Northern European women? What's the low-hanging fruit that men should keep in mind?

Also the geographic location where women are at makes a big difference too. Some of the rap songs from the 90's bears this out, for example Biggie Smalls' "One More Chance" where he says he doesn't chase 'em he replaces 'em shows the cold, aloof, ruthless bad-boy approach of males in urban centers like New York or Sao Paulo, which actually works wonders with some women. But this approach would be overkill in a small town community where women aren't as used to being approached by random men, particularly on the street.

There are different Dialects of Womanese, and a man must be well-versed in the dialect of his target population.

Yeah I was confused..do you have any other examples?

The book is incredible.

That's one of the most interesting articles I've read lately.

I have one question though. You said:

Why do you need to alternate between two styles of conversation [masculine and feminine]? Because when it comes to the modern woman, she will alternate between preferring one style or the other, depending on the circumstances.

So in what circumstances does a woman prefer the masculine style and when does she prefer the feminine one?

Thanks